When a firm can't take a matter, it can — with the person's informed consent — place a listing here for other lawyers to find. The listing says what kind of case and where. Who the person is stays sealed until a verified lawyer who intends to reach out unlocks it.
Unlock only if you intend to contact this person. Your unlock is logged. The listing firm is not notified.
People looking for a lawyer call the firms they can find — usually the handful at the top of the search results — whether or not those firms are the right fit. When a firm can't take the matter, the caller goes back to the list and works down it, one rejection at a time. Most of those calls are wasted, and the person doing the calling has no better way to find a lawyer who actually wants the case.
ClientFeeds gives the firm a better answer than "try someone else." If the person agrees, the firm posts a listing to the feed. Every lawyer on the feed can see it, and any lawyer who wants the case can contact the person directly. Nobody is matched — the person simply becomes findable, on their own terms, by lawyers who are actually looking.
It reads like any social feed — because underneath, it is one. The feed runs on a private Nostr relay, so listings arrive in real time, firms post under their own identities, and verified lawyers (or their software) can connect straight to the relay instead of browsing a page. The difference is what's inside a post: four open facts, and a sealed part that only a verified lawyer can unlock.
Unlock only if you intend to contact this person. Your unlock is logged. The listing firm is not notified.
Unlock only if you intend to contact this person. Your unlock is logged. The listing firm is not notified.
Illustrative preview with demo data — these are not real listings, people, or firms (except us). Replies, approvals, and follows all happen inside the verified pool, only on listings that identify no one.
The venue only works if everyone inside it can trust how information moves. These aren't aspirations — they're conditions of participating.
Breach of any of these terminates access. Interaction between lawyers inside the venue — comments, approvals, messages — stays on listings that identify no one; unlocked names and contact details never go back into the feed.
We have already corresponded with bar ethics counsel about this model, and we invite review by any state ethics board.
Every listing is placed under the firm's own identity — contributions are attributable, not anonymous. Because the feed runs on Nostr, the social layer comes with it: verified lawyers can follow a firm, react to a listing, and comment, all inside the verified pool and only on listings that identify no one. A firm that consistently places good-faith listings builds a visible track record the ordinary way — by other lawyers seeing it.
Tell us who you are and how you'd like to participate. We'll reach out to talk it through — nothing posts to the feed, and nobody gets access, from this form alone.
If a firm listed you here and you've changed your mind, that's all it takes — tell us below and we'll take the listing down and delete your sealed name and contact information. One limit we're honest about: a lawyer who already unlocked your listing may still have that information, like an email already sent.